http://www.alternet.org/economy/155078/mf_global:_the_untold_story_of_the_biggest_wall_street_collapse_since_lehman
MF Global: The Untold Story of the Biggest Wall
Street Collapse Since Lehman
The AlterNet / By Pam Martens
There are plenty of lessons to be
learned from MF Global, all of which we can count on Congress to ignore at the
behest of Wall Street money until the next financial crisis.
Only on Wall Street can
you bankrupt a company; misplace $1.6 billion of customers’ money; lose 75 percent of shareholders’ money in two weeks; speed
dial a high priced criminal attorney and get a court to authorize
the payment of your multi-million dollar legal tab from the failed company’s
insurance policies; have regulators waive your requirements to take licensing
exams required to work in the securities and commodities industry; have
your Board of Directors waive your loyalty to the firm; run a bucket shop
out of the UK; and still have the word “Honorable” affixed to your name in
a Congressional investigations hearing.
This is not
a flashback to the rotting financial carcasses
of 2008. This putrid saga has been playing out
in five Congressional hearings since December with the next episode
scheduled for Tuesday, April 24, before the Senate Banking
Committee under the auspicious title: “The Collapse of MF Global: Lessons
Learned and Policy Implications.” (The title might more appropriately be,
“MF Global: Lessons Never Learned
and Policy Implications of a Wild West Financial System Just One
TradeAway from the Next Taxpayer Bailout.”)
There are plenty of lessons to be
learned from MF Global and heart-pounding policy implications;
all of which we can count on Congress to ignore at the behest of the Wall
Street money and lobby machine until the next epic financial crisis – an
eventuality that is growing more likely each day as Congress refuses
to restore the Glass-Steagall Act, the depression era legislation that bars
Wall Street securities firms from owning banks holding insured
deposits.
MF Global, the
eighth largest bankruptcy in U.S. history,
held 36,000 customer accounts in the U.S. , over 5,000 in the
U.K. , and an unknown
number in Japan , Australia , and Hong Kong . It’s a forensic
accounting mess. Can you imagine what it would be like if one of the
major Wall Street firms failed with more than 3 million customer accounts?
MF Global filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. on October 31, 2011 because of off balance sheet
transactions and proprietary trading – a quaint name for betting
the house with other people’s money – resulting in a downgrade of their
credit rating to junk and a resulting collapse in liquidity.
In MF Global’s unique
world of risk controls, the CEO of the firm was doing the proprietary
trading. Off balance sheet transactions blew up Citigroup in 2008,
requiring hundreds of billions in taxpayer funds and guarantees to
shore it up. Proprietary trading, of the heads we win, tails you lose
kind, has cost Goldman Sachs and Citigroup serious reputational damage with
customers. And yet, no lessons have been learned. Off balance sheet
bombs are still lurking all over Wall Street and the SEC continues
to stall on outlawing proprietary trading at securities
firms holding customer accounts.
The CEO of
MF Global when it disintegrated was Jon Corzine, the former New
Jersey Senator and Governor and former co-head of Goldman Sachs &
Co. Corzine took the reins of MF Global
in March 2010. Conflicts abounded with the knowledge and rubber
stamp of the Board of Directors. Corzine was not just Chairman and CEO,
he was the firm’s top trader of volatile European BIIPS debt – Belgium ,
Italy , Ireland ,
Portugal and Spain .
Corzine took the firm’s position from approximately $500 million
when he was hired to $8.1 billion (including Greece
and France ) in
the 19 months it took him to blow up the firm. (How
does the CEO of a financial firm police a cowboy trader when he’s the
same individual?) When the Chief Risk Officer of the firm, Michael
Roseman, raised warnings about the risk with the Board of
Directors, Rosemanwas asked to leave and replaced with a new Chief
Risk Officer acceptable to Corzine, according to Congressional testimony given
by Roseman and Corzine.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment or make suggestions