The war on the poor will be taken: up again in earnest tomorrow. See below for a preview of Dr. Jared Bernstein's position on the issue.
*New Time* Davis and Tiberi Announce Hearing
on How Welfare and Tax Benefits Can Discourage Work
Jun 27, 2012
*New Time*
The hearing will take place on Wednesday, June 27, 2012, in 1100 Longworth House Office Building immediately following the full committee markup that begins at 10:00 AM.
Focus of the Hearing:
This hearing will focus on the interaction of various welfare and tax credit programs and how concurrent receipt of benefits from those programs can create perverse incentives that discourage work and higher earnings.
Hearing Advisory:
Davis and Tiberi Announce Hearing on How Welfare and Tax Benefits Can Discourage Work
Witness List:
Panel 1:
The Right Honourable Iain Duncan Smith
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, United Kingdom
Panel 2:
Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI)
Panel 3:
Dr. Clifford Thies, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics and Finance, Shenandoah University
Dr. Eugene Steuerle, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, The Urban Institute
Dr. Jared Bernstein, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Dr. Ike Brannon, Ph.D.
Director of Economic Policy and Congressional Relations, American Action Forum
Submission of Written Comments:
Click here to submit comments for the record.
*New Time*
The hearing will take place on Wednesday, June 27, 2012, in 1100 Longworth House Office Building immediately following the full committee markup that begins at 10:00 AM.
Focus of the Hearing:
This hearing will focus on the interaction of various welfare and tax credit programs and how concurrent receipt of benefits from those programs can create perverse incentives that discourage work and higher earnings.
Hearing Advisory:
Davis and Tiberi Announce Hearing on How Welfare and Tax Benefits Can Discourage Work
Witness List:
Panel 1:
The Right Honourable Iain Duncan Smith
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, United Kingdom
Panel 2:
Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI)
Panel 3:
Dr. Clifford Thies, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics and Finance, Shenandoah University
Dr. Eugene Steuerle, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, The Urban Institute
Dr. Jared Bernstein, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Dr. Ike Brannon, Ph.D.
Director of Economic Policy and Congressional Relations, American Action Forum
Submission of Written Comments:
Click here to submit comments for the record.
The Pro-Work, Anti-Poverty EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit)
June 26, 2012 at 1:47 pm
A House Ways and Means subcommittee will hold a hearing tomorrow on how the structure of safety-net programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) affects recipients’ work incentives.
As our new report explains, numerous studies have found that the EITC not only encourages work but also reduces poverty, helps families meet basic needs, and improves children’s achievement in school and likely increases their earnings as adults. The Child Tax Credit (CTC), a related tax credit designed to help offset the cost of raising children, also plays a pivotal role in helping low-income families.
For example:
- Encouraging work. Numerous studies have found that the EITC promotes work. “[T]he overwhelming finding of the empirical literature is that EITC has been especially successful at encouraging the employment of single parents, especially mothers,” write economists Nada Eissa of Georgetown University and Hilary Hoynes of the University of California, Davis. In fact, while policymakers often point to the 1996 welfare law’s creation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) as the primary reason for increased work among single mothers, the research indicates that expansion of the EITC had a larger effect than the welfare law in producing these gains.
Reducing poverty. The EITC and CTC lifted 9.2 million people — including 4.9 million children — above the poverty line in 2010, under a broad measure of poverty that counts refundable tax credit payments as income (and subtracts income and payroll taxes). (See graph.) Improvements in these credits enacted as part of the 2009 Recovery Act are responsible for lifting 1.6 million of those people above the poverty line.
- Providing a short-term safety net. Most EITC recipients claim the credit only temporarily when a job disruption or other significant event reduces their income. A recent study found that, of people who received the EITC over an 18-year period, 61 percent received the credit for only one or two years at a time. A forthcoming study finds that over time, EITC recipients as a whole pay far more in federal income taxes than they receive in EITC benefits.
- Improving children’s school performance and increasing their work effort and earnings as adults. A small but growing body of research indicates that lifting the incomes of low-income families helps children in those families do better in school. The added income may help children later in life, as well: recent research finds that raising a poor family’s income by $3,000 a year (a fairly typical amount for a poor family to receive from the CTC and EITC) between a child’s prenatal year and fifth birthday is associated with a significant increase in the child’s earnings in adulthood. The leading study finds a 17 percent increase in earnings in adulthood, and an average of 135 hours of additional work per year, compared to similar children whose families do not receive the increase in income.
Click here for the full report.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment or make suggestions