New GAO Report: FORECLOSURE REVIEW
Opportunities Exist to Further
Enhance Borrower Outreach Efforts
Selected Excerpts from
the GAO Conclusions:
Readability tests of the
outreach letter, request-for-review form, and website indicate that a high
school or even a college reading level may be required to understand them. The initial communication materials were not
available in languages other than English.
Neither the servicers nor
the regulators conducted readability testing or focus groups with the target
audience of eligible borrowers, and regulators initially did not solicit input
from consumer or community groups familiar with these borrowers complexity in the communication materials may
prevent people from becoming sufficiently aware of the foreclosure review, and
the prospect of confusing or complex forms may discourage people from
participating.
Our previous reports and
federal plain language guidelines indicate that whether agencies are preparing documents
or requiring private sector companies to prepare them, testing communication
materials is a sound practice to help ensure that the audience can understand
them and use them to take action. Moreover, complexity in the communication
materials may prevent people from becoming sufficiently aware of the
foreclosure review, and the prospect of confusing or complex forms may
discourage people from participating.
In addition… [communication
materials] do not include specific information about the potential types or
amounts of remediation borrowers may receive. Specifically identifying that the
types of remediation may consist of such items as lump-sum payments, rescinding
foreclosures, repayment of out-of-pocket expenses, or correcting credit reports
could help motivate borrowers to respond.
Finally, the planning, and
in particular, evaluation of the borrower outreach process were based on
limited analysis of eligible borrowers. Although
servicers conducted some targeted outreach to African-American and Spanish-speaking
borrower, in part due to feedback from consumer groups, the outreach process
was largely uniform. Regulators have monitored
the status of outreach activities, but have not analyzed the differences in
characteristics between respondents and nonrespondents in planning the
additional outreach efforts
Read report pdf: http://www.gao.gov/assets/600/592059.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment or make suggestions