(Please see commentary and sample lesson below)
TN virtual school draws criticism
Tennessee , other statesfind results below par
As
state officials lambaste the Tennessee Virtual Academy for low achievement scores and discuss
new oversight methods, the school’s management company is facing an
investigation in Florida , overcoming a list of citations issued in Georgia and recovering from reports of
poor results in many of its schools.
The virtual academy allows students in grades K-8 to take
all their classes online, monitored by a certified teacher. It is managed by K12 Inc., a publicly
traded for-profit company that has contracts for differing levels of
involvement with at least 2,000 other schools across the nation.
In its first year, the Tennessee academy ranked among the bottom 4
percent of districts in the state on a measure that shows student progress from
year to year.
State Rep. Joe Pitts, D-Clarksville, called the school “a risky
experiment that blew up in our face.”
K12 officials say the school can’t be judged fairly for
effectiveness in its first year of operation and the score should only be
considered a first-year baseline for future comparisons.
However, Tennessee is not the only state where the
management company has been criticized.
A research paper published in July by the National Education Policy Center at
the University of Colorado Boulder recommended
national education officials slow down the approval of virtual schools while
examining effectiveness and cost. The study showed achievement scores of K12
students were not on par with those of traditional schools.
A class-action lawsuit against K12 is pending in a U.S. District
Court in the Eastern District of Virginia claiming the company made inflated
claims about its student achievement in an effort to inflate stock prices.
And The New York Times spent months researching the company
before publishing an article in December critical of its test
scores.
Results challenged
Josh Williams, head of school for the Tennessee Virtual Academy , said the virtual school’s results
were not carefully analyzed before making conclusions.
Only about 25 percent of the students were measured, Williams
said, and these first results are incomplete. A national measure used by K12,
the Scantron Performance Series, indicates K12
Tennessee students are above the national average, he added.
The scores being used against the virtual academy are part of theTennessee Value-Added Assessment
System, an analysis of student academic growth over time.
“When K12 first lobbied the legislature, I worried that it was
going to open us up to a provider with bad scores,” state Sen. Andy Berke,
D-Chattanooga, said last week.
“In the last several years, we’ve tried to raise standards as a
state, and to push the idea of excellence for every child. K12 simply doesn’t
deliver that.”
Pitts plans to introduce legislation in January to allow a
virtual school with poor scores to be evaluated each year instead of every two
years.
“If we are going to hold teachers and students and parents
accountable, we’ve got to hold virtual and charter schools just as
accountable,” Pitts said.
Troubles in Fla. , Ga.
Adding to the company’s woes is an investigation by the Florida attorney general into claims the
company does not use Florida-certified teachers — a claim the company denies.
The company uses only Tennessee-certified teachers in Tennessee , Williams said.
The Georgia Department of Education has threatened to shut down
a K12 Inc. virtual school if changes to teacher-student ratio and caseload for
special education teachers are not made by October. The changes have been made
and the school is waiting for an examination of the changes, said Jeff
Kwitowski, senior vice president of public affairs for K12 Inc.
Kwitowski believes K12 is taking the publicity hit for many
changes sweeping the nation under the banner of “education reform.” The changes
give parents control of their children’s education, which threatens the
traditional educational power structure, he said.
A first for TN
More than 2,000 students signed up last year when the Tennessee Virtual Academy was officially launched by Union County Public Schools,
a small district in East Tennessee .
A 2011 state law allows any school district to do what Union County has done: contract with a for-profit
management company to operate a virtual school that will accept students from
all over the state.
Union County Schools Director Wayne Goforth thinks Pitts and
Berke are upset over how quickly Union County jumped on an opportunity to form a
partnership with the for-profit K12.
“They opened the door and we hopped on it,” Goforth said. “We
are a poor county and we needed revenue.”
The school system collects 4 percent of the roughly $10 million
in state education funds that flow through its district on the way to K12. The
partnership has made the Union County the only revenue-producing school
system in the state, Goforth said.
While some other districts offer online classes and even
full-time school programs online, Goforth said Union County is the only one to partner with a
for-profit company.
“The Union County school system has created this
monster, and I am really upset that the door is open,” Pitts said.
The Metro Nashville school district has a full-time online high
school program and is making plans for a middle school program as well, but it
is purchasing curriculum and managing the program internally.
Flexibility is draw
Holly Wooten is one of the parents drawn to the flexibility
allowed by a virtual school. It’s a selling point K12 uses when promoting its
virtual school during information sessions like one last week at the Nashville library. The session drew just
four parents.
Wooten and her four kids can be found doing schoolwork on the
front porch of their home just outside Nashville on particularly beautiful days.
The Wooten kids are in second, fourth, sixth and 10th grades,
and all score very well on standardized tests, their mother said. Because the Tennessee academy goes only through eighth
grade, her high school son uses a different online system.
When Wooten home-schooled her children, she independently
purchased the K12 Inc. curriculum for each of them.
“I feel like the curriculum is superior, the highest caliber
I’ve seen,” she said. “It applies to all learning styles.”
K12 also provides opportunities for its students to take field
trips or attend other events with their virtual classmates. For example,
parents and students attended a school year kickoff event at the Nashville Zoo.
K12 teacher likes it
While teachers in other states have reported a heavier workload
than promised by K12, Tennessee teachers have not made that
complaint.
K12 Tennessee teacher Rebecca Williams chose virtual school so
she could stay home with her infant son when her husband was deployed with his
Army unit.
Her workload is about the same as it would be for a teacher in
the traditional bricks-and-mortar situation, Williams said.
Because of virtual school, Williams thinks she and her
colleagues “are able to truly focus on meeting the needs of our students,” she
said.
DATA
DRIVEN VIEWPOINT:
ACTUAL
SAMPLE LESSON for
High School Physics. This lesson example
contains no formulas or mathematics. It
is a physics lesson that could be taught in elementary school. It omits the important context and thinking
process that lead Isaac Newton to his discover the laws of gravity. Developing the ability to convert concepts
into simple formulas and formulas back into concepts is critical learning for
students.
Now imagine
the lesson below being taught in a home setting by a parent who may have less
than a high school education. Try imagining
how well this student will do in college physics a year or so later.
In
the seventeenth century, a physicist and mathematician named Sir Isaac Newton
wrote three laws describing why objects move. These three laws have become
known as Newton´s three laws of motion. To understand the laws that Newton wrote about, you must first
understand two concepts:
inertia:
an object´s resistance to change in its state of motion
acceleration:
the change of velocity over time
Newton´s
three laws of motion are as follows:
Every
object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion
unless an external force is applied to it.
There
is a relationship between an object´s mass, its acceleration, and the applied
force.
For
every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment or make suggestions