Dear Starledger Editor:
"The day of reckoning has come," Gov. Christie
says. He thinks it's time that wasteful urban schools and poor districts pulled
their own weight. He wants them to pay the full cost to educate their kids from
property tax revenue. His one size fits all state aid plan will bring
tax relief to wealthy (mostly Republican) suburbia. Here's what he doesn't say:
- · The 10 largest urban districts and 10 wealthiest school districts have virtually the same per pupil costs ($20.0k vs. $20.5k by my calculations)
- · The average median income in these 10 urban districts is around $45,000 vs. $159,000 in the wealthiest districts
- · More money is spent in urban districts on remediation to overcome the impact of poverty; while more money is spent in wealthy districts on advanced educational programs and high end sports
- · Property taxes are based on home values, which are 4.7 times higher in the wealthiest districts
- · Even with little state aid to offset costs, the average property tax rate in the wealthiest districts is 67% lower than in the largest urban districts
Instead of proposing a flat state aid rate per child
Governor Christie should be proposing a flat property tax rate collected by each
county and distributed according to need. As regressive as a flat tax is it
would still be less regressive than what we have now.
Brian T Lynch, MSW
(for more detail on my analysis, go to:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment or make suggestions