Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Immigrants Amid the Opulence Long Ago

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

This is a story of two Irish immigrants who came to America during a different era. Thomas Lynch was from Clonmore, County Meath, and Ellen (Nellie) McGeever was from Doocastle, County Mayo.

Around 1914, during the heart of the Progressive Era, America was rife with turmoil, social activism and political reform from which would soon emerge America’s middle class. Yet even then the embers of the Gilded Age glowed brightly in areas where families of enormous wealth played out their lives of regal excess. During the Gilded Age, the wealthy elite built impressive country estates at which they entertained the rich, famous, and powerful figures of the day.
screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.13.02 pm
The Florham Estate in Madison, New Jersey, was one such home.  Built between 1892 and 1899 by Hamilton Twombly and his wife, Florence Vanderbilt, the Florham mansion was the 8th largest home in America. Today the estate is a beautiful college campus, but around 1914 the Florham Mansion was still a mecca of high society.

By contrast, Ireland around 1914 was a fairly dismal place, especially in the countryside where prospects for a better life were nil and subsistence living was the norm. Ireland was still under British rule and the “Irish Question” hung in the air. That question was about how to transform these brutally subjugated people into a semi-autonomous country after nearly 800 years of British rule. Many of the Irish youth couldn’t wait for the answer. They hitched their fate to the “American Dream” and boarded ships to the United States. My future grandparents were among those young dreamers. Nellie McGeever from County Mayo on the west of Ireland and Thomas Lynch from County Meath in the east set sail for America not knowing each other and not knowing what to expect when they got here.

It wasn’t until my second semester at Fairleigh Dickenson University in 1972 that my father casually mentioned how ironic it was for me to be walking the same grounds where my grandparent met. He told me my grandmother was a cook and my grandfather a chauffeur for the Twombly’s. My aunts later confirmed this as true. I have pieced together a bit more history since, but never felt a real sense of that family history until my sister and I went to see the mansion this January.

My grandfather, Thomas Lynch, was born in 1891, one of thirteen children of Peter Lynch (b.1846) and Catherine Cusick (b.1862). His passage to America was preceded by several of his older brothers who rented a house at 4 Albert Avenue in Morris Township. Ironically, many years later my father would use his GI bill from WW II so his parents could buy that home where they lived the rest of their lives. It was the home my family visited often when I was a boy.



screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.13.30 pm
On February 23, 1919, Thomas and Nellie married at the Church of the Assumption in Morristown. Their attendants were Thomas’s brother John Lynch and Nellie’s sister Hanorah (Nora) McGeever. One day in late January or early February of 1920, Thomas and Nellie boarded a White Star-Dominion Line ship named “The Baltic” to returned to Ireland where they planned to raise a family. Nellie's sister Nora McGeever was also on board heading back to Ireland with them. The couple arrived in Liverpool, England on the 9th of February, 1920, but sadly, Nora died on board the ship five days earlier.

screen shot 2019-01-29 at 11.42.39 am
Thomas and Nellie settled in a small cottage located on a “bohereen,” (Irish: bóithrín, meaning "a little road", is a country lane) near the little village of Kildalkey, County Meath. There they had my father, Peter, and four girls, Nora, Kathleen, Rosie and Elizabeth.

[http://www.kildalkeyvillage.com/gallery.html#pic25]


When my sister Patty and I were young, grandpa was a somewhat short old man with thick white hair and piercing blue eyes. He always wore trousers, suspenders, a white shirt and a vest where he kept his silver pocket watch on a long chain. He smoked a pipe and he had such a thick Irish brogue that I sometimes couldn’t understand him. He kept beautiful flower beds in the backyard and carefully tended his rose bushes by the white rail fence out front.

But granny was always the central figure. She was a bit plump with soft round features that belied her underlying strength of personality. She always wore long flowered dresses and shoes with thick, short heals. She never wore shorts or pants. She had dark grey hair kept under a hair net. She was the center of activity, which often involved food. Watching her moving about in her kitchen was my favorite pastime during visits. She would put on a clean linen or a flowered apron and move around so quickly and easily it was like a dance. She was organized and never unsure of what she had to do next. When she made Irish Soda bread she measured everything by eye or by feel and made it look quick and easy. She whipped up custards and soufflés and made different sauces for the meats and vegetables she served during the holidays. Her cakes and desserts were beautiful and tasted amazing. Little did my sister and I know that this wasn’t typical Irish fare.

Our January visit to the Twombly mansion in 2019 was my sister’s first. Her enthusiasm was infectious. We walked around the elegant hallway, stared at the portraits and marveled at the Grand Ballroom. Patty wanted to see the kitchen but I had no idea where it was. She walked into one of the offices and met Mark, who works there. She introduced us as the grandchildren of two former servants which prompted him to tell us about the building and the times when they had worked there.

screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.14.59 pm

Mark told us how to find where the kitchen had been and about all the other rooms we would visit as we walked about. We learned that the barn-like building where our grandparents lived was still standing behind the Science Center. Across from it still stands a row of garages where twelve maroon Rolls Royces and other automobiles were kept. My grandfather would have worn a matching maroon livery uniform when he drove those cars. He told us there was once a tunnel between the servant’s quarters and the basement of the mansion where my grandmother and other servants would walk back and forth so they wouldn’t be seen on the grounds of the Estate.

Perhaps most surprising of all, we learned that Nellie Lynch worked under the wealthiest and most famous private chef in the world.  Joseph Donon was a world renown chef who once fought for France during World War I. He was hired by Mrs. Twombly in 1917 to fulfill her request to give her “the best of the best.” He replaced most of the kitchen staff and hired his own workers who were loyal to him. Nellie may have stayed on because we have never heard of her working anywhere else before she married Thom.

Our recent visit to the Florham Estate made our family history come alive. We have a better idea of who these two immigrants and the social influences that help mold them.

screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.15.31 pm
screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.15.53 pm The red building to the left is where the servants lived on the Twombly Estate. Directly across the driveway is a long row of garages where The Twombly’s many cars were stored and maintained.


screen shot 2019-01-29 at 5.16.23 pm

A picture of the mansion and grounds that was taken about a third of the distance to the servant’s quarters. A tunnel under this area allowed the servants to enter the home without being seen.

Florham Campus: A History of the Estate

https://view2.fdu.edu/campuses-and-centers/florham-campus/about-the-florham-campus/florham-campus-a-history-of-the-estate/

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Obsessive Political Delirium Syndrome – Confessions of a Chronic Sufferer


by Brian T. Lynch, MSW



What follows is a post from the Humans of New York Facebook page that unfortunately resonated with both my daughter and me. I recognized this account as a satirical description of what I call “Obsessive Political Delirium” syndrome:

“I had three bottles of wine on election night. I got in bed after Pennsylvania and stayed there for a week. I’d only get up to use the bathroom and get more wine. I’d have left the country by now if it wasn’t for my elderly mother. I’ve weaned myself off Xanax, but I haven’t recovered.

I still watch MSNBC all the time. I’ll spend entire days on the couch. I’ll wake up with Morning Joe and go to sleep with Brian Williams. I’ll get on Twitter during the commercials and search for any hint that somebody’s going to be indicted. I know way too much. I know the name of every congressman. I know their district. I know what percentage of the vote they got.

Before 2016, I hadn’t purchased a book in twenty years. Now I buy all the political ones. The scarier the better. I even got the Omarosa book. Nobody else wanted to read it so I thought I’d take one for the team. I went to DC for four different protests.

And a few weeks ago I drove down to Mexico to see for myself what was happening on the border. I’m obsessed. It’s not healthy. Recently I was able to cut myself off from politics for about a week. But then here comes Brett Kavanaugh and I’m back on the couch for three days.”

The malady described above first gripped me when Richard Nixon won the Presidential election in 1964. His politics and creepiness consumed my attention right up until his impeachment. My political worrying was debilitating and depressing. It also triggered a secondary obsession over the prior assassinations of two Kennedys and a King. I have never been able to shake the feeling that those assassinations are the start of a long thread that has run through U.S. history ever since.

No sooner had I gotten my life back under control when WHAM! Ronald Reagan was elected. He surrounded himself with some of the same creeps and spooks that buzzed around Nixon. That bout of fibral political delirium peaked with the Iran-Contra scandal and dissipated slowly due to the very dissatisfying lack of another well-deserved impeachment.

Then I went into a deep political slumber for a while, and it was glorious. But one evening a CBS news special to explain this new White-Water scandal failed to reveal anything at all of substance. I remember thinking, "OH GOD! Not again!" Here was another rogue’s gallery of radical neo-cons and dirty tricksters flexing their new conservative media machines. They were out for a revenge impeachment of Bill Clinton, and they got it. Clinton wasn't convicted in the Senate, of course, because well... lying about a blow job to protect your reputation isn't exactly a high crime. Still, the dark forces behind the conservative façade got their pound of flesh.

After that I thought I would catch a break, but then Bush v. Gore happened.  I went nuts all over again about the stolen election and the discovery that electronic voting machines were craftily designed to be hacked. All the voting machine companies were owned by partisan Republicans at the time. That bout of the infliction culminated in my having to hire a First Amendment Lawyer to protect me from a threatened SLAPP suit by the company that ran our local elections, and a threatened criminal investigation of me by my county Prosecutor for bringing our local electronic voting machine vulnerabilities to the attention of our county government. I fended off the SLAPP suit (incurring legal fees) but it had its intended effect on me. I shut up about local politics.

I set out to cure myself of obsessive political delirium and was just starting to make good progress when Donald Trump started winning primaries. And OMG… here we are in the thick of the worst political disaster in our country’s history, with a President who is a “Clear and Present Danger” to the security of the United States.

I feel so bad for my children who have come down with this horrible affliction. I have suffered from recurring bouts of it my whole adult life. And the trauma now is greater than at any time in the past. Is this the final festering of an old injury that began with Kennedy’s assassination, or is it the end of America as we know it? I take some solace in the results of the 2016 Congressional election that has installed so many women and such great diversity into the House of Representatives. I also take comfort in the rising activism of a younger generation, including Parkland survivors, that sees things the same way I do. For my children’s sake, I hope that my hope for the future will be realized this time.

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

CYBER WARFARE EXPLAINED - How We Are Being Manipulated

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

CYBER WARFARE EXPLAINED: Using various traditional and high tech methods, political and social divisions are being created and amplified in the US and other Western nations by the enemies of democracy and civilian rule. The divide created in this DISINFORMATION war is an INFORMATION divide. If you can divide a large group of people on what they believe to be true, they are beyond reach in a rational policy argument. Here is an overly simplified overview of the Cyber Warfare strategy:


- First, saturate the media environment of a disaffected subgroup of the population with an internally coherent set of altered facts that are attractive to them. Drown out the mainstream, traditional media information sources.

-Create suspicion and distrust of traditional news and journalistic institutions and of government and democratic institutions. Increase the target groups reliance on alternative media sources.

- Then go about influencing and developing the opinions of those who accept these altered facts by creating false narratives and seeding the alternative media with coordinated messaging.

- Next, manipulate and agitate the emotional states of the target population with manufactured scandals and elaborate conspiracy theories directed against those on the other side of the information divide.

- Reward this targeted group when their social media responses affirm the false narratives the alternate messaging on social media.

- Foster and a sense of loyalty among believers in the targeted group (creating in effect a tribalistic peer group of like-minded "patriot").

- Now the divide becomes difficult to breach, tumultuous in its social discourse, aggressive in its behavior towards others outside their social group and self-sustaining (due to our natural human social dynamics).

- Create enough of these social and political divides within a nation's population and the country becomes ungovernable as a civil democracy. The country becomes vulnerable to the rise of authoritarian dictatorship.




Regretfully, I am just beginning to understand how we are being attacked. How we fight back and win is not yet clear to me.




Further Reading:

Russia InfoWar Attacks via US Social Media: https://aseyeseesit.blogspot.com/2018/12/russia-info-warfare-attacks-via-us.html

Mueller's Russia Indictment - A Condensed Summary
https://aseyeseesit.blogspot.com/2018/02/muellers-russia-indictment-condensed.html

Propaganda in the Digital Age - Mind Control on a Massive Scale:
https://aseyeseesit.blogspot.com/2017/03/propaganda-in-digital-age-mind-control.html

Sunday, January 13, 2019

New Research - Health Benefits of Fiber Expanding (this is not an ad)

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

Two insightful science articles recently came out that are worth sharing, one on diet and the other on exercise. I will share the diet article first.

The link here and below is to an article about dietary fiber. There is an expanded understanding as to how fiber contributes to human health. As many of us know, fiber helps regulate our bowels which may play a role in lowering colon cancer rates. Fiber may reduce cholesterol, perhaps by absorbing and thus eliminating certain fats the body uses to make cholesterol in the body. And it might help reduce inflammation which helps prevent heart disease, etc. We know there is both soluble fiber and insoluble fiber that isn't digested in the body.

The BBC article linked here summarizes the latest research on how fiber actually works in the body to benefit our health. The biggest takeaway for me was the discovery that indigestible dietary fiber is the primary food source for our gut bacteria.

A diverse and balanced intestinal flora is essential to good health and that disrupting that balance can lead to diseases as well as infections like Merca, Sepsis, and death. It turns out that our gut bacteria act like miniature chemical factories producing all sorts of exotic substances that our body relies on to maintain our health, substances that our body cannot make on its own.

The recent trend has been to toss back a copious amount of probiotics, which contain large numbers of just a few of the thousands of strains of active gut bacteria. A regular regiment of ingesting these little buggers never made much sense to me. It does make sense to re-seed your bowels during or after a course of antibiotics that kills off these good bugs, but if the environment down there is healthy, few probiotic capsules containing live bacteria should be all that is needed. Flooding the gut with just a few strains of bacteria doesn't seem like a good way to achieve a balance.

Now I realize that feeding the bacteria that live in our intestines is a much better strategy to maintain a healthy digestive ecosystem, and dietary fiber is their food of choice for that purpose. The article goes on to talks about how much fiber we need and how to get it. It's worth reading.

Now the unanswered questions for me include; Are there high-quality fibers more inducive to good health and low-quality fibers that aren't as good for our intestinal flora? For example, is the psyllium fiber Metamucil less edible for gut bacteria than say, the fiber in an apple?

The link: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-46827426

Friday, January 11, 2019

BORDER SECURITY THREAT ASSESSMENT: Do Facts Reveal a Border

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

The government is shut down as I write. If you happen to read this blog post after today, it will be the longest federal government shutdown in United States' history. The reason for it is a claim by the President that there is a national crisis at the border. The President says we aren't safe and the crisis can't be resolved without five-billion-dollars to build a section of wall. 

IS THERE A CRISIS AT THE BORDER? Or is our President having a temper tantrum as some have suggested?

Let us start to answer that with statistics that President Trump’s own administration presents about border security. 

Per data in Donald Trump's Executive Order 13789, the # of non-citizens federally convicted of terrorists in 15yrs 2mo time = 244 terrorists, (16 per yr.). That's 44% of the total terrorists. The other 295 (55%) are US citizens 1/2 of which (8.5/yr.) were foreign-born. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1026436/download 

PLEASE NOTE: As of NOW, if you try to VERIFY the URL and link above you will get this message instead of the document:


Continuing with the report: 

In this same 182-month period, 1,716 US aliens, or 113 per year, were removed from the country for being a national security threat. In contrast, there are 1,300,000 domestic violence attacks per year or 11,504 attacks for every alien ejected for being a security risk.

The Executive Order also says there are 25 honor killings each year, but there are also over 1,000 domestic violence deaths of intimate partners per year in the US. Honor killings are 2.5% of that total.

AND THIS is directly from the Executive Order: In the fiscal year 2017, DHS had 2,554 encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist traveling to the United States. Of those encounters, 335 were attempting to enter by land, 2,170 by air, and 49 by sea.

That is just 13% of all terrorist watchlist persons traveling by land from either from Canada or the Mexico border.

Since 2010, the last 8 years, there have been 46 terrorist attacks in the US resulting in 106 dead and 527 injured (Boston bombing nearly half the injuries): 20 attacks by Islamic extremists, 16 by rightwing extremists, 5 by 4 by mental illness and 1 by a leftwing extremist. (The author from a list of terrorist attacks on Wikipedia)

Border crossers rape and murder at lower rates than the general population. Or to flip that around, they are more law-abiding than our citizens. Here is a summary of an actual scholarly report:
In the context of crime, victimization, and immigration in the United States, research shows that people are afraid of immigrants because they think immigrants are a threat to their safety and engage in many violent and property crimes. However, quantitative research has consistently shown that being foreign-born is negatively associated with crime overall and is not significantly associated with committing either violent or property crime. If an undocumented immigrant is arrested for a criminal offense, it tends to be for a misdemeanor.

Researchers suggest that undocumented immigrants may be less likely to engage in serious criminal offending behavior because they seek to earn money and not to draw attention to themselves. Additionally, immigrants who have access to social services are less likely to engage in crime than those who live in communities where such access is not available.

In regard to victimization, immigrants are more likely to be victims of crime. Foreign-born victims of crime may not report their victimization because of fears that they will experience negative consequences if they contact the police. Recently, concern about immigration and victimization has turned to refugees who are at risk of harm from traffickers, who warehouse them, threaten them, and physically abuse them with impunity. More research is needed on the relationship among immigration, offending, and victimization. The United States and other nations that focus on border security may be misplacing their efforts during global crises that result in forced migrations. Poverty and war, among other social conditions that would “encourage” a person to leave their homeland in search of a better life, should be addressed by governments when enforcing immigration laws.

http://oxfordre.com/.../97801.../acrefore-9780190264079-e-93

Here are a few data charts that are helpful in identifying whether or not there is a present crisis at the border:






OXFORDRE.COM

Immigration and Crime - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of…

Immigration and Crime - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology


And here is another study ABSTRACT: 
Research has shown little support for the enduring proposition that increases in immigration are associated with increases in crime. Although classical criminological and neoclassical economic theories would predict immigration to increase crime, most empirical research shows quite the opposite. We investigate the immigration-crime relationship among metropolitan areas over a 40-year period from 1970 to 2010. Our goal is to describe the ongoing and changing association between immigration and a broad range of violent and property crimes. Our results indicate that immigration is consistently linked to decreases in violent (e.g., murder) and property (e.g., burglary) crime throughout the time period.https://www.tandfonline.com/.../10.../15377938.2016.1261057
TANDFONLINE.COM

A 2018 study published in Criminology analyzed population-level crime rates from all 50 states from 1990 to 2014 and found that the relationship between immigration and crime is "generally negative." "Increases in the undocumented immigrant population within states are associated with significant decreases in the prevalence of violence," study author Michael Light writes.https://psmag.com/.../research-tells-us-that-immigration...

PSMAG.COM

A 2015 study found that, in the same period, the immigration population more than tripled in the United States; from 1990 to 2013, the violent crime rate decreased by 48 percent, according to Federal Bureau of Investigation data. (ibid)






Here is a screenshot of a graph by the Pew Research Center from a FactCheck.org Website


https://www.factcheck.org/2018/06/illegal-immigration-statistics/

And here below are a few more charts from a U.S. Customs and Border Security Report that were also published by FactCheck.org :


Notice in the above bar graph dating all the way back to 1961 that the total number of border crossings the year 2000 and has significantly declined since.  The total number of border crossings in 2018 (last year) is 76% below the number in 2000.


While the total number of people crossing the U.S. border is down 76% from the year 2000, the number of family detentions is up. 


Notice that the number of unaccompanied children crossing the border peeked in 2014 and dropped the following year. The number rose again in Barack Obama's last year in office then dropped again since President Trump took office. Last year (2018) the rate of unaccompanied minors crossing the border was about 37% lower than in 2014. 


SUMMARY: From every scholarly study and government information source, the most objective rendering of facts do not support the claim that there is an immigration crisis at our border. And in fact, the data show such a low rate of crimes committed by immigrants that the more immigrants a community has, the lower the crime rate. 

As to why our President is claiming a border crisis and shutting down the government to get his wall build? Who besides him really knows why. What the facts show is that there is no border crisis and no need to disrupt the government and the lives of millions of people affected by the shutdown. 



Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Russia Info-Warfare Attacks via US Social Media

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW


Russia didn’t begin targeting Americans on social media until 2013. That’s when they began tweeting in English. This followed a very extensive and successful twitter campaign within Russia to sway support for the invasion into parts of Ukraine.

By 2014, Russia Twitter activity in the US started ramping up rapidly, and activity on other social media platforms began, starting with YouTube, Instagram and then Facebook. Activities on these platforms took the form of coordinated campaigns. Russia leveraged these different platforms to lend support for ideas or activities initiated on another platform. For example, they might send a flurry of tweets to promote a news story posted on a Russian Facebook page taken from American based websites that they could strategically exploit.  

One such campaign was an attempt to raise fears and suspicion within African-American communities, part of an overall strategy to intensify racial animus within the U.S. They created what looked like an American based organization called Black Matters US. They opened a twitter account, a Black Matters Facebook page, an Instagram account etc.  They then used their platforms to promote and amplify the most radical or polarizing content they could find on domestic websites.  They added radical commentary or made statements like, “We are in danger!” or “Cops kill black kids. Are you sure that your son won’t be the next?”  

Influence campaigns such as this increase in number and volume. Most were designed to polarize Americans and turn us against each other. During the 2016 election season, additional campaigns were conducted to harm Hillary Clinton’s chances to become President. Vladimir Putin personally disliked Hillary, but also because she would maintain or increase US sanctions imposed on Russia for its aggression in Ukraine. The idea that the Russian campaign was primarily to harm Hillary Clinton isn’t accurate either. Interfering in our election was just one focus out of many. In fact, following the election of Donald Trump, Russian propaganda operations in the US continued to grow dramatically. The overall goal of Russia’s massive cyber operations in the United States and around the world is to degrade the ability of countries to function as democracies. Russia is attacking the West using sophisticated information warfare technology.



 https://www.axios.com/senate-reports-russian-interference-2016-election-9d0daca6-1e2d-4617-9295-f8eec61c1719.html

The above graph shows the growth of Russia’s social media activity across several platforms. It represents the pace of the attacks on our democracy. Here below is an overview of the Internet Research Agency (IRA) in Russia that is spearheading the attacks.


Saturday, December 15, 2018

ICE vs. New Jersey's Attorney General

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

New Jersey’s Attorney General, Gurbir Grewal, finds that federal ICE agents are leaning on state and local police to enforce federal civil immigration laws, thereby reducing the effectiveness of our law enforcement agencies ability to fight crime within immigrant communities.

On November 29, 2018, Grewal issued a directive telling state law enforcement agencies not to blur the distinction between the federal government’s civil law enforcement agents and our state law enforcement agencies. He directed police agencies to, “… build trust within our state’s large and diverse immigrant communities,” so residents aren’t afraid to work with officers, “… to solve crimes and bring criminals to justice.” 

He didn't tell law enforcement not to cooperate with ICE, but to cooperate within constitutional boundaries and within guidelines that don't interfere with their essential mission. The Attorney General issued new guidelines that will go into effect in March.

The Directive immediately created a public clash between Federal Immigration and state law enforcement officials.

On December 8, 2018, the Star-Ledger newspaper reported that ICE arrested 105 immigrants in a five-day long raid conducted in sixteen New Jersey counties. While these raids were planned before the Directive, ICE officials told reporters who asked about the timing, “… there will likely be an uptick in arrests of immigrants living in the country illegally in the wake of state Attorney General Gurbir Grewal’s announcement last week that he is limiting how much local and state police can help immigration officials.”

ICE officials told the Star-Ledger that 80% of the immigrants they caught in that raid had prior criminal records. They said, “Our focus has been, and will continue to be, on arrests of illegal aliens who have been convicted of serious crimes or those who pose a threat to public safety.”

On December 14th the Star-Ledger reported on one of those “serious” criminals captured by ICE.

Dane Foster is a 36-year old Jamaican-born man who became a legal U.S. resident in 1997. He is the sole breadwinner in a family of four children with his wife, Alexsa, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served for seven years. He is the owner of a small lawn care business. Foster was dropping off his daughter at her daycare center when three vehicles rushed in, surrounded his car and publicly arrested him.

Why was he targeted for arrest and deportation? He had a criminal charge nearly 20 years earlier for which he pled guilty and paid a fine.

Asked about Foster’s case, a spokesperson for ICE said, “ICE conducts targeted immigration enforcement actions in compliance with federal law. Dane Foster, a Jamaican national, is subject to removal from the U.S. based on his criminal history.”

Notice the changes from the prior ICE statement above. In the case of Dane Foster, ICE arrested a legal, not an illegal alien, and they dropped the word “serious” from in front of “criminal history.”

Can we fully trust a federal law enforcement agency like ICE when its public actions exceed its publicly stated mission? Is Dane Foster really a threat to public safety? Or is he more of an asset to the community? And who will care for his family now?



Old African Proverb: When elefants fight the grass dies.



Friday, November 23, 2018

The Idiots of Democracy

By Brian T. Lynch, MSW

So much of what we call Western Civilization had its origin in Ancient Greece. On a recent trip to Athens, my wife and I stood on the steps leading up to the great temple at the Acropolis. It was on these very steps that democracy was first practiced in the ancient world.




 When important decisions of governance had to be made, all the men of the city (sorry ladies) were summoned. They came and stood on these steps where they freely and openly debated all sides of the issues before them. They then called for a vote, and by a show of hands decided the issues in question. It was for all of them a liberating and empowering experience unlike anything citizens ever experienced before.

But even so, there were always some men who choose not to participate, men who stayed away. The Greeks had a word for such men. In English the word they called them means “individual” but not in a positive sense. It was more in the sense of a person who holds themself apart from others, who doesn’t pull their weight or work for the welfare of the community in which they live.

The Greek word for this was “IDEOS” from which we get the word idiot. 

That’s right, people who didn’t vote or participate in democracy were called idiots back then, and they are still idiots today.

Counter